With testimonies currently ongoing in the Coast Guard and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement 's joint investigation into the causes of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion, many revelations are now coming to the surface. The most startling revelation is that BP was aware of a myriad of safety issues surrounding the Deepwater Horizon, and chose, for a variety of reasons, to ignore them.

Investigators are saying that BP should have suspended drilling operations given the severity of the allegedly known safety issues. The allegations of BP's awareness of safety issues on the Deepwater Horizon rig have come to light because of the testimony of BP employee Ronald Sepulvado. Sepulvado, a Deepwater Horizon well site leader, coincidently left the rig only four days before the catastrophic blowout.

In his testimony, Sepulvado said that he was aware of a leak on a control pod atop the well's blowout preventer and notified his supervisor in Houston about the problem. Sepulvado did not consider the problem to be crucial. Sepulvado is quoted as saying, "I assumed everything was OK because I reported it to the team leader and he should have reported it."

The device in question is the Deepwater Horizon's blowout preventer, which according to the LA Times is, "a 450-ton hydraulic device, designed to prevent gas or oil from blasting out of the drill hole." This is the very same device that is reported to have failed during the April 20th disaster. Maritime attorneys find this to be in violation of a law requiring BP to disclose this information to the proper federal agency and suspend operation until the specific problem has been resolved.

Making matters worse for BP are two more reports of warnings BP received only days before the disaster aboard the Deepwater Horizon. Sepulvado has confirmed one of the reports, sent April 15. This report, sent by Halliburton, warns of minor gas flow risks in the well. Halliburton partnered with BP on the design and construction of the well drilled by the Deepwater Horizon, and has also been investigated for their role in the events leading up to the April 20 blowout. Of this report, Sepulvado is quoted as saying, ""I didn't read it in its entirety."

As for the second report, Halliburton sent it on April 18 to BP officials aboard the Deepwater Horizon as well as on land. The April 18 report makes recommendations as noted by the Houston Chronicle to address flaws with the cement job "used to secure pipe-like casing to the walls of the Macondo well." Macondo is the official name of the oil and gas prospect being drilled by the Deepwater Horizon. Sepulvado however could not corroborate the existence of this report as he could the April 15 report. Regardless of this fact, the existence of three reports, the corroboration of at least one, and the testimony given by Sepulvado are more than enough to indicate negligence on BP's part, and give merit to the many lawsuits against BP currently being brought on.